I want to start this post by saying that Alan Jones comments, on the passing of Prime Minister Gillard's father, were cruel and ill mannered. Australians all know Jones can be quite parochial. It is a former Wallabies coach. From time to time he forgets that the sledging of the sporting field isn't so welcome in the media arena.
Having said that, I find it bafflingly hypocritical that such authors of hate as the vile Marieke Hardy and Catherine Deveny would dare think they were qualified to chastise Jones.
Catherine Deveny is infamous for having tweeted that she hoped a young Bindi Irwin - whose father had been killed not two years before - “gets laid tonight.”
Marieke Hardy's piece on ABC's The Drum website, on Coalition MP Christopher Pyne, was pulled by the editors. In the piece she claimed Pyne was the most hated man in Australia.
Hardy has also called anyone who waves an Australian flag on Australia Day a racist. I imagine she thinks 4th of July is a Klan gathering.
Deveny, always loud and infantile, is notorious for comments she makes every ANZAC day likening young men who fought at Gallipoli, and on the Western Front, to homophobes and racists.
So here we have the moral police. Dishing out their own, self approved trash talk, while keeping big bad conservative haters in check.
Sunday, 30 September 2012
Bigot Cher Accuses Tea Party of Bigotry
I've never been a fan of Cher because. Well. I'm the wrong demographic. My girlfriend doesn't have a penis and my pants don't have sequins. Her latest Twitter comments haven't exactly endeared her to me.
Cher continues with the same bigoted comments about the Tea Party. She calls them Nazis. Nazis were Left Wing, Cher. They advocated state control. They were socialists. You know, like your saviour in the White House with his socialist agenda: redistribution, Obamacare. That's why they were called the National Socialists. They weren't the National Capitalists.
Cher then comments that the country is "getting too brown for them (Tea Party Conservatives)." Once again, a liberal accusing Obama critics of racism. Want the man out of the White House? It's 'cause he's black, right? Liberals are so predictable you wonder why Nostradamus didn't warn us about them (Nostradamus was a fraud. Ed.) Maybe there's a bit in Revelation about it. The Liberals come just after the four horsemen.
The saddest, most pathetic tweet was the one where she said Tea Party Republicanthes were like the men in the old days who yelled "Get a rope." Oh, Cher. Is this just a MASK or are you really that MOONSTRUCK. And here I was thinking that a woman who accepted an Oscar, dressed like a hooker, would have a little more sense.
Firstly, those men of old who hollered "Git a rope" were nearly always. Sorry. WERE ALWAYS Democrat voters or Democrat sympathizers. The Democrats are the party of slavery, segregation, and LYNCHINGS. Secondly, isn't it a bit unliberal-like to use the past sorrows of Black Americans to make a point against Conservatives. That's not very sensitive of you, Cher.
Really it's Democrats she's attacking. But her lack of historical knowledge blinds her to that fact. "You mean the party that my saviour Obama belongs to is the same party that intimidated Black voters after the Civil War, and segregated them for the next 100 years. You're just a racist Tea Party Nazi."
Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you Cher. A woman who sang Gypsies, Tramps and Thieves, not realising she was singing about the Democrats.
Cher continues with the same bigoted comments about the Tea Party. She calls them Nazis. Nazis were Left Wing, Cher. They advocated state control. They were socialists. You know, like your saviour in the White House with his socialist agenda: redistribution, Obamacare. That's why they were called the National Socialists. They weren't the National Capitalists.
Cher then comments that the country is "getting too brown for them (Tea Party Conservatives)." Once again, a liberal accusing Obama critics of racism. Want the man out of the White House? It's 'cause he's black, right? Liberals are so predictable you wonder why Nostradamus didn't warn us about them (Nostradamus was a fraud. Ed.) Maybe there's a bit in Revelation about it. The Liberals come just after the four horsemen.
The saddest, most pathetic tweet was the one where she said Tea Party Republicanthes were like the men in the old days who yelled "Get a rope." Oh, Cher. Is this just a MASK or are you really that MOONSTRUCK. And here I was thinking that a woman who accepted an Oscar, dressed like a hooker, would have a little more sense.
Firstly, those men of old who hollered "Git a rope" were nearly always. Sorry. WERE ALWAYS Democrat voters or Democrat sympathizers. The Democrats are the party of slavery, segregation, and LYNCHINGS. Secondly, isn't it a bit unliberal-like to use the past sorrows of Black Americans to make a point against Conservatives. That's not very sensitive of you, Cher.
Really it's Democrats she's attacking. But her lack of historical knowledge blinds her to that fact. "You mean the party that my saviour Obama belongs to is the same party that intimidated Black voters after the Civil War, and segregated them for the next 100 years. You're just a racist Tea Party Nazi."
Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you Cher. A woman who sang Gypsies, Tramps and Thieves, not realising she was singing about the Democrats.
Saturday, 29 September 2012
Swans Premiers 2012
Congratulations to the Sydney Swans, especially to former Canadian rugby international Mike Pyke. He did some good things today, and is far from the "worst footballer in the AFL", as Brian Taylor called him.
Friday, 28 September 2012
Ahmadinsanity
The sane among us know the real agenda of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. And it's not one of peace. Some "useful idiots" really believe Ahmadinejad is a wise man with progressive ideas. Take, for example, this guy: http://blogcritics.org/politics/article/ahmadinejads-un-speech-what-the-us/
They See Misogyny Everywhere
Some have used the death of Jill Meagher as evidence of a misogynist society and a culture of misogyny, especially among Australian men.
https://mobile.twitter.com/josephlaboston/status/251675005807628290?p=v
Monday, 24 September 2012
A Modern Classic
A favourite of mine, from a very underrated band.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DT-dxG4WWf4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DT-dxG4WWf4
Sunday, 23 September 2012
Gillard's UN Push
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/gillard-leads-final-push-for-un-role-20120923-26fgm.html
Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard seems hell bent on getting a spot on the UN Security Council. If successful, Australia would be in the company of such beacons of democracy and human rights as as Togo, Colombia, Guatemala and Pakistan.
With an election next year - maybe even earlier - you would think Gillard would have more pressing issues back home. Besides, we don't need to grovel to the "Useless" Nations. We just look like sycophants trying to get the approval tyrants. Security Council membership seems to be a badge of honour, street cred among nations. It's a shame most of the members are political ghettos. Not good company to keep.
Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard seems hell bent on getting a spot on the UN Security Council. If successful, Australia would be in the company of such beacons of democracy and human rights as as Togo, Colombia, Guatemala and Pakistan.
With an election next year - maybe even earlier - you would think Gillard would have more pressing issues back home. Besides, we don't need to grovel to the "Useless" Nations. We just look like sycophants trying to get the approval tyrants. Security Council membership seems to be a badge of honour, street cred among nations. It's a shame most of the members are political ghettos. Not good company to keep.
Tuesday, 4 September 2012
The Delusions of the Left
Liberals painting Clint Eastwood as delusional and senile forget their own delusions when it comes to their adoration of Obama.
Liberals like Rachel Maddox have called Eastwood's speech at the Republic National Covention, "weird" and "strange." Eastwood has been joked about; and the image of him talking to an empty chair has become a meme on the Internet.
But compare the strangeness of Eastwood talking to an empty chair to the ridiculous love some have for Obama. There was the Black woman happy that she wouldn't have to worry about the bills now that chief fix-it was in the White House. There are the idiots who called this most inexperienced of presidents a vessel of "hope and change."
There are the fools who have their picture taken next to his portrait, perhaps hoping that touching it will cure their ailments, make them reborn. The media refer to Obama's anointing, as if he were a Biblical king. Really? And Eastwood was being weird?
The Left are so delusional they thought an Illinois senator, with barely 3 years experience in Washington, would deliver the "hope and change" places like Detroit desperately need. They are delusional to think that enslaving the taxpayer, through initiatives like ObamaCare, will make America a better country. That taking away gun rights will make America safer. That supporting abortion and gay marriage enhances freedom and empowers women and gays. Delusional. All of it. And they think Clint is mad. I wonder if they're feeling lucky about November.
Liberals like Rachel Maddox have called Eastwood's speech at the Republic National Covention, "weird" and "strange." Eastwood has been joked about; and the image of him talking to an empty chair has become a meme on the Internet.
But compare the strangeness of Eastwood talking to an empty chair to the ridiculous love some have for Obama. There was the Black woman happy that she wouldn't have to worry about the bills now that chief fix-it was in the White House. There are the idiots who called this most inexperienced of presidents a vessel of "hope and change."
There are the fools who have their picture taken next to his portrait, perhaps hoping that touching it will cure their ailments, make them reborn. The media refer to Obama's anointing, as if he were a Biblical king. Really? And Eastwood was being weird?
The Left are so delusional they thought an Illinois senator, with barely 3 years experience in Washington, would deliver the "hope and change" places like Detroit desperately need. They are delusional to think that enslaving the taxpayer, through initiatives like ObamaCare, will make America a better country. That taking away gun rights will make America safer. That supporting abortion and gay marriage enhances freedom and empowers women and gays. Delusional. All of it. And they think Clint is mad. I wonder if they're feeling lucky about November.
Monday, 19 March 2012
Heaping On the White Guilt
I went to bed last night in a rage, having been told by ABC panellists that my presence in this country is illegal. That my mother, brother, and young daughter were all criminals trespassing on Aboriginal land.
Once again (yeah, it's getting pretty tedious, it's it - we were lecture on the instituitonal racism of this country. The governments of years past had enabled racist, divisive policies such as the White Australia policy, and because of this flawed past racism has remained a disease of the Australian mind.
Germaine Greer, though admitting to being in London 8 months of the year, still thought she knew enough about Australia's current social climate to judge us all as racist remnants of a distant past.
Of course, my anger eased once I told myself that the panellists lecturing me were just a remnant themselves. A remnant of a distant past when Australians were judged as racist idiots. Don't listen to them, I told myself, you're smarter than that.
Once again (yeah, it's getting pretty tedious, it's it - we were lecture on the instituitonal racism of this country. The governments of years past had enabled racist, divisive policies such as the White Australia policy, and because of this flawed past racism has remained a disease of the Australian mind.
Germaine Greer, though admitting to being in London 8 months of the year, still thought she knew enough about Australia's current social climate to judge us all as racist remnants of a distant past.
Of course, my anger eased once I told myself that the panellists lecturing me were just a remnant themselves. A remnant of a distant past when Australians were judged as racist idiots. Don't listen to them, I told myself, you're smarter than that.
Tuesday, 6 March 2012
The Fine Art and Gentle Science of Medical Murder
In retrospect, reading an essay on after-birth abortion probably wasn't a good way to start the day. Infact it was the worst thing I could have read. While the semantically tip-toed drivel of Drs Albert Giublini and Francesca Minerva didn't contribute to my morose mood this afternoon it certainly did make me want to throw up, even on the packed City bound train.
In their essay, for the "Journal of Medical Ethics," entitled "Why Should the Baby Live?" Giubilini and Minerva give examples of cases where it should be permissable to perform an after birth abortion.
Here's dumbass me thinking doctors were supposed to save lives.
So what "reasons" do Giubilini and Minerva (I will not be referring to them as doctors for the remainder of the article because I feel they have lost the right to that title. I will be doing what I can to influence their deregisteration.)
Cases in which after birth abortion might be practised:
1- "A woman whose partner leaves her after she discovers that she is pregnant."
Say a young lady is 3 days off her due date. Her partner (probably a drug addict scumbag) courageously leaves her and his unborn child.
The woman gives birth on the due date, but then decides, arbitrarily, that she can't afford to look after the child by herself.
So a murderer posing as a doctor comes along and slays the child while the mother watches. Cackling maniacally at the same time.
See, in the Western world we have a thing called social security, and welfare. Single mothers have access to help from the government in providing for their child. The affordability argument has never be more to me than a bad excuse for legalised infanticide.
But what other examples do the learned quacks give?
Emotional impact on family members. That includes parents, siblings.
The murderous twosome argue that the emotional burden on families, the emotional burden on siblings as well, should be taken into account.
Yeah, it's hard being a kid these days. One minute you're turning 12, the next some cute little poser has just popped out of your Mum and started hogging all the affection.
I know how devastated I was when my brother and sisters were born.
If only there was some way that the older siblings didn't have to feel the emotional pain of having a beautiful little baby enter their lives.
The essay also says that children may be an "unbearable burden on the family and society as a whole."
There was once a man who thought certain "burdens" on society should be eliminated. He had a funny moustache, wore a brown shirt, and really loved birthday parties at Nuremberg.
Yeah, THAT guy.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Giubilini and Minerva, here for all your unwanted disposal needs.
Throughout the essay the authors refer to newborns as "potential persons." They aren't persons because they are "incapable of looking after there own interests. They are potential persons though.
Strangely, animals are considered to be persons by the authors.
So because little bub doesn't have the physical strength to go out and get a job to pay the mortgage, or feed himself, it's okay to kill him.
That's what you get when the medical world that once used to save lives so eagerly sells it's soul to Satan.
The authors go on to make more strange assumptions. Such as suggesting that mothers may face more grief and psychological stress giving up their baby for adoption than they would if they aborted it.
Yes, it can be so stressful knowing that your child is alive and well, being raised by another family, breathing the air, playing at the beach, learning the beauties of life. Why didn't you just kill it when you had the chance.
Things Giubilini and Minerva think are more important than newborn babies.
- animals
- the mother's psychological state
- the bratty siblings
- the dead beat father
- Imagined future society
But I think the saddest thing is that many of these children are left to die alone on slabs of cold metal. In trays. In bins. No one to hold their hand as they die a lonely death.
Alright that's enough of this topic.
Next week something amusing.
God bless the innocent dead. Your cries shall not be ignored.
This article is dedicated to the victims of the greatest holocaust of the modern era. May they see Jesus threw the darkness of their final lonely hour.
In their essay, for the "Journal of Medical Ethics," entitled "Why Should the Baby Live?" Giubilini and Minerva give examples of cases where it should be permissable to perform an after birth abortion.
Here's dumbass me thinking doctors were supposed to save lives.
So what "reasons" do Giubilini and Minerva (I will not be referring to them as doctors for the remainder of the article because I feel they have lost the right to that title. I will be doing what I can to influence their deregisteration.)
Cases in which after birth abortion might be practised:
1- "A woman whose partner leaves her after she discovers that she is pregnant."
Say a young lady is 3 days off her due date. Her partner (probably a drug addict scumbag) courageously leaves her and his unborn child.
The woman gives birth on the due date, but then decides, arbitrarily, that she can't afford to look after the child by herself.
So a murderer posing as a doctor comes along and slays the child while the mother watches. Cackling maniacally at the same time.
See, in the Western world we have a thing called social security, and welfare. Single mothers have access to help from the government in providing for their child. The affordability argument has never be more to me than a bad excuse for legalised infanticide.
But what other examples do the learned quacks give?
Emotional impact on family members. That includes parents, siblings.
The murderous twosome argue that the emotional burden on families, the emotional burden on siblings as well, should be taken into account.
Yeah, it's hard being a kid these days. One minute you're turning 12, the next some cute little poser has just popped out of your Mum and started hogging all the affection.
I know how devastated I was when my brother and sisters were born.
If only there was some way that the older siblings didn't have to feel the emotional pain of having a beautiful little baby enter their lives.
The essay also says that children may be an "unbearable burden on the family and society as a whole."
There was once a man who thought certain "burdens" on society should be eliminated. He had a funny moustache, wore a brown shirt, and really loved birthday parties at Nuremberg.
Yeah, THAT guy.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Giubilini and Minerva, here for all your unwanted disposal needs.
Throughout the essay the authors refer to newborns as "potential persons." They aren't persons because they are "incapable of looking after there own interests. They are potential persons though.
Strangely, animals are considered to be persons by the authors.
So because little bub doesn't have the physical strength to go out and get a job to pay the mortgage, or feed himself, it's okay to kill him.
That's what you get when the medical world that once used to save lives so eagerly sells it's soul to Satan.
The authors go on to make more strange assumptions. Such as suggesting that mothers may face more grief and psychological stress giving up their baby for adoption than they would if they aborted it.
Yes, it can be so stressful knowing that your child is alive and well, being raised by another family, breathing the air, playing at the beach, learning the beauties of life. Why didn't you just kill it when you had the chance.
Things Giubilini and Minerva think are more important than newborn babies.
- animals
- the mother's psychological state
- the bratty siblings
- the dead beat father
- Imagined future society
But I think the saddest thing is that many of these children are left to die alone on slabs of cold metal. In trays. In bins. No one to hold their hand as they die a lonely death.
Alright that's enough of this topic.
Next week something amusing.
God bless the innocent dead. Your cries shall not be ignored.
This article is dedicated to the victims of the greatest holocaust of the modern era. May they see Jesus threw the darkness of their final lonely hour.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)