Crazy Green's Policies

One need only look at the Green's policies on Aboriginal affairs, and animal welfare, to see double standards and hypocrisy. Why do I highlight these two particular areas? Well, read this section, from their animal welfare policy statement:

A ban on the recreational shooting of all animals, including Australian native water birds

Native birds are already protected; but it's the Greens, so we can't expect facts.

Now see this from the Green's policy statement on Aboriginal affairs:

The rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders to sustainably hunt, fish and gather native flora and fauna in line with traditional cultural practice

Hold on a minute. I thought the Greens wanted native fauna to be protected (it already is). Yet they propose a policy of allowing Aboriginal people the right to use traditional methods of hunting.

Traditional Aboriginal methods of hunting include the use of spears to kill kangaroos, and the burning of bush habits to scare animals out into the open. The Greens think this traditional form of hunting is acceptable, yet the more humane methods used by modern hunters is unacceptable.

Only in the Green's twisted world would spearing an animal to death be considered more acceptable than a quick, single shot from a rifle.

But that's the crazy Greens for you.

Nicola Roxon, this week, shamefully used her valedictory speech to federal parliament to highlight the negatives of Australian society, and to stir up even more "us against them" rhetoric among the pseudo victims of the feminista. Roxon spoke about an underbelly of sexism.

Yeah, sexism is so bad in this country half of us voted for a government lead by a female prime minister; while the other half, the Coalition voters, admire such great women as Margaret Thatcher, and have tremendous respect for Julie Bishop.

Sexism is so bad Nicola Roxon got the opportunity to rise to the position of Attorney General.

Roxon pointed to the "crass, sexist" behaviour the prime minister has been subject to, failing to mention that much of the criticism of Gillard has been constructive and warranted.

Yes, examples such as the Howard Sattler interview last week show a tendency for some to behave in a way they would not towards a male politician. But such examples are not indicative of an "underbelly of sexism."

Speaking on the same day, outgoing Labor senator Trish Crossin, who makes way for Nova Peris, said that were needed in parliament, but "not at the expense of each other."

What?

So a woman could replace a man, but a woman can never replace a woman?

And some people wonder how quotas are seen by many as sexist?

Labor, like much of the left, has yet to fully to understand the concept of individuality. It still thinks women are a single entity. It still blankets women under the cloak of "reproductive rights" as if they are a single vagina.

Roxon's speech did nothing but attempt to stir up fear and division. The Labor party is no doubt disappointed she retired.

Apologies

Apologies for the time between posts. I have been rather busy. I'm studying film, and working on a number of different projects at once.

One thing I have learnt is how one can use media to convey their message. As a passionate conservative with a slight libertarian lean, it annoys me that so much of what passes for film these days is leftist drivel and revisionist moralizing.

Films such as, Rabbit-Proof Fence, from my own country, portray historical events as a stereotypical, 2-dimensional cut-out. Very little cinematic attention is given to pro-conservative ideals and beliefs.

With this in mind, I have made it my aim to bring more of a conservative voice to film. Whether it be subtle, or obvious for all to see, conservative thought and opinion has a place in film and literature. It belongs in media just as centre left views do.