Nicola Roxon, this week, shamefully used her valedictory speech to federal parliament to highlight the negatives of Australian society, and to stir up even more "us against them" rhetoric among the pseudo victims of the feminista. Roxon spoke about an underbelly of sexism.

Yeah, sexism is so bad in this country half of us voted for a government lead by a female prime minister; while the other half, the Coalition voters, admire such great women as Margaret Thatcher, and have tremendous respect for Julie Bishop.

Sexism is so bad Nicola Roxon got the opportunity to rise to the position of Attorney General.

Roxon pointed to the "crass, sexist" behaviour the prime minister has been subject to, failing to mention that much of the criticism of Gillard has been constructive and warranted.

Yes, examples such as the Howard Sattler interview last week show a tendency for some to behave in a way they would not towards a male politician. But such examples are not indicative of an "underbelly of sexism."

Speaking on the same day, outgoing Labor senator Trish Crossin, who makes way for Nova Peris, said that were needed in parliament, but "not at the expense of each other."

What?

So a woman could replace a man, but a woman can never replace a woman?

And some people wonder how quotas are seen by many as sexist?

Labor, like much of the left, has yet to fully to understand the concept of individuality. It still thinks women are a single entity. It still blankets women under the cloak of "reproductive rights" as if they are a single vagina.

Roxon's speech did nothing but attempt to stir up fear and division. The Labor party is no doubt disappointed she retired.