Monday, 8 October 2012
Hugo Chavez's Socialist "Success."
Could we show this to Sean Penn? Such a utopia of freedom and progress: http://www.heritage.org/index/country/venezuela
Friday, 5 October 2012
The Bitter, Spiteful Haters.
The left shows it's lack of class. As if we didn't already know they were cretins and bottom dwellers.
ttp://memegenerator.net/instance/27859411?urlName=Sensitive-Tony&browsingOrder=New&browsingTimeSpan=AllTime
The leftist bullies who have taken over the web, are getting much enjoyment out of posting bile like this:
https://mobile.twitter.com/gabster0191/status/254088610930913280?p=v
Tony Abbott has been called a homophobe. He has a gay sister, who he loves and stands by. He has gay friends.
He has been branded a racist. He works during the summer in poor Aboriginal communities. Building houses and learning about issues that affect the Indigenous people of Australia. Where are the pious and preachy Greens at this time.
Abbott has been labelled a misogynist. Let me ask. Who is the real hater of females? A husband of over 20 years, faithful and loving? A father of three well raised, happy daughters? Or leftist feminists who advocate killing baby girl foetuses?
The bitter left only knows one way. Attack What bitter sad people.
ttp://memegenerator.net/instance/27859411?urlName=Sensitive-Tony&browsingOrder=New&browsingTimeSpan=AllTime
The leftist bullies who have taken over the web, are getting much enjoyment out of posting bile like this:
https://mobile.twitter.com/gabster0191/status/254088610930913280?p=v
Tony Abbott has been called a homophobe. He has a gay sister, who he loves and stands by. He has gay friends.
He has been branded a racist. He works during the summer in poor Aboriginal communities. Building houses and learning about issues that affect the Indigenous people of Australia. Where are the pious and preachy Greens at this time.
Abbott has been labelled a misogynist. Let me ask. Who is the real hater of females? A husband of over 20 years, faithful and loving? A father of three well raised, happy daughters? Or leftist feminists who advocate killing baby girl foetuses?
The bitter left only knows one way. Attack What bitter sad people.
Thursday, 4 October 2012
1st Presidential Debate
A little thing I noticed early on: the number of times the President 'ummed' and 'ahhed.' Romney was confident, a true businessman with a business mind. Obama came across as a professional bureaucrat.
In typical Democrat fashion, the Presidents solution to create more jobs is to, eh, increase taxes.
Of course Obama didn't say these exact words; no, socialism is coded with certain 'phrases.'
He spoke about investing in education. Which is fine and good. But it doesn't guarantee immediate jobs. It's no use investing in the future if adults in the present can't find jobs.
Say the government invests in engineering courses at college. That's all well and good for the future. But a better way to create engineering jobs would be by lowering the taxes on the people whose companies build the bridges.
Romney was straight to the point, well spoken, open. Obama was apologetic, timid, lost for words.
Romney 1; Obama 0.
In typical Democrat fashion, the Presidents solution to create more jobs is to, eh, increase taxes.
Of course Obama didn't say these exact words; no, socialism is coded with certain 'phrases.'
He spoke about investing in education. Which is fine and good. But it doesn't guarantee immediate jobs. It's no use investing in the future if adults in the present can't find jobs.
Say the government invests in engineering courses at college. That's all well and good for the future. But a better way to create engineering jobs would be by lowering the taxes on the people whose companies build the bridges.
Romney was straight to the point, well spoken, open. Obama was apologetic, timid, lost for words.
Romney 1; Obama 0.
Wednesday, 3 October 2012
Massacre of Students in Nigeria
You won't read this in the mainstream media.
http://www.sowetanlive.co.za/news/world/article6766260.ece
Obama's War On Christianity and Religious Freedom
So now even Bible publishing houses aren't free from the atheist swords of revolution.
President Obama is an atheist. He calls himself a Christian, but he's about as Christian as Elizabeth Warren is Cherokee. He is anti theistic. He is AGAINST the teachings and views of all Christian churches and denominations.
Jesus said that to enter heaven we must learn to be "like the little children." Obama interpreted this as "stab the baby and suck it's brains out."
A majority of American Christians would not support gay marriage. Despite what liberals always claim, the US is still very conservative, and rightly puts family values and children's rights ahead of a dudes right to marry another dude. Despite this, Commander-in-Cheap supports gay marriage so that his media spin doctors and screaming liberal hipster cheerleaders continue to worship him.
So what has the Constituion hating fraud done this time?
The Obama administration says that Tyndale House Publishers, a Bible publishing company, is NOT classified as a religious employee, and should have to contribute to insurance coverage - including abortion procedures and contraceptives - for it's employees.
Sorry, the 1st Amendment just doesn't have the same appeal as it used to. The first victim of this new secular dictatorship was always going to be Christianity.
The Bill of Rights are a set of suggestions for Obama, that's all. He adheres to what he wants, how he wants. Freedom of religion? Sure. Except I'll be getting you Christians to pay for something you don't believe should be legal, a procedure akin to murder. So you're Catholic? You won't mind paying for contraception for your staff. Religious freedom my foot.
Obama is as bad as the worst religious tyrants of history like Oliver Cromwell, Pol Pot and Kim-Jung Il, who banished, persecuted and murderously sought out the followers of religions they did not approve.
His Constitutionally twisted beliefs are disturbing not only because he considers himself a Christian, but more so because he considers himself an American. He's lying to himself on both counts.
President Obama is an atheist. He calls himself a Christian, but he's about as Christian as Elizabeth Warren is Cherokee. He is anti theistic. He is AGAINST the teachings and views of all Christian churches and denominations.
Jesus said that to enter heaven we must learn to be "like the little children." Obama interpreted this as "stab the baby and suck it's brains out."
A majority of American Christians would not support gay marriage. Despite what liberals always claim, the US is still very conservative, and rightly puts family values and children's rights ahead of a dudes right to marry another dude. Despite this, Commander-in-Cheap supports gay marriage so that his media spin doctors and screaming liberal hipster cheerleaders continue to worship him.
So what has the Constituion hating fraud done this time?
The Obama administration says that Tyndale House Publishers, a Bible publishing company, is NOT classified as a religious employee, and should have to contribute to insurance coverage - including abortion procedures and contraceptives - for it's employees.
Sorry, the 1st Amendment just doesn't have the same appeal as it used to. The first victim of this new secular dictatorship was always going to be Christianity.
The Bill of Rights are a set of suggestions for Obama, that's all. He adheres to what he wants, how he wants. Freedom of religion? Sure. Except I'll be getting you Christians to pay for something you don't believe should be legal, a procedure akin to murder. So you're Catholic? You won't mind paying for contraception for your staff. Religious freedom my foot.
Obama is as bad as the worst religious tyrants of history like Oliver Cromwell, Pol Pot and Kim-Jung Il, who banished, persecuted and murderously sought out the followers of religions they did not approve.
His Constitutionally twisted beliefs are disturbing not only because he considers himself a Christian, but more so because he considers himself an American. He's lying to himself on both counts.
Political Hijackers
What is it with the Left and their attempts to hijack opposing parties from the inside? The Left are always going on about how moderate a candidate is. To them, left of Che Guevara is moderate.
Conservative parties around the world have succombed to this pestilence. In the USA, the rise of the RINO (Republican in name only) has reached such a point that some have said they will only vote for Romney because it's at least an alternative to the "Obamanation."
In Britain, Prime Minister David Cameron's support for abortion, gay marriage, and a tax on carbon, hardly makes him a conservative. In fact, that's the very antithesis of a conservative.
He makes up for his support of abortion by declaring he wants the legal limit lowered from 24 to 20 weeks. A real conservative would introduce a bill abolishing the practice all together.
In Australia, opposition leader Tony Abbott, a Catholic Conservative, wants to introduce a paid parental leave scheme if elected. Under a Coalition government, the parental leave payment would extend from 18 weeks (4 and a half months) to 6 months. It is akin to forced socialism, is anti business, and will encourage unprincipled types to have a baby so they can stay at home, while still getting full wages, for 6 months.
The same party, when in office, introduced the controversial Baby Bonus: an assistance payment to new parents. It has since gone from a lump sum payment to fortnightly instalments. However the damage was already done. People in low socio-economic regions suddenly turned into rabbits.
The $5000 (Australian money) payment went not on baby supplies, or towards medical bills, but on plasma TVs, drugs, cigarettes, alcohol.
In introducing this new welfare disease, the Coalition betrayed the people they were supposed to represent, and bowed to the demands of the welfare infected Left.
The Left want conservatives to meet them in the middle. But that "middle" keeps moving more and more to the Left each time.
Liberals cheer "moderate" conservatives, hoping that these "moderates" infect parties from the inside. There is evidence of this in the Australian Left's support for Malcolm Turnbull,
who advocates many Left leaning positions.
In America there are questions over Mitt Romney's sincerity as a conservative. Here is a man who was elected governor of the very liberal state of Massachusetts. A man who once publicly declared his support for Roe vs Wade. Showing he holds not only views unborn babies with contempt, but also the 10th Amendment.
The Left want THEIR Romney in the White House. It's a clever each way bet. If Obama is booted out, they can hope that THEIR Romney will take up residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Romney needs to show the Left that he's NOT their friend. He needs to show the Left that they already have their "Dear Leader." He needs to avoid bowing down to the principles, I
mean, lack of principles of the Left. Every politician wants to
appear trendy. Every politician wants to appeal to the 20-something vote, to the minority vote. Maybe it's time they started appealing to sense instead.
Conservative parties around the world have succombed to this pestilence. In the USA, the rise of the RINO (Republican in name only) has reached such a point that some have said they will only vote for Romney because it's at least an alternative to the "Obamanation."
In Britain, Prime Minister David Cameron's support for abortion, gay marriage, and a tax on carbon, hardly makes him a conservative. In fact, that's the very antithesis of a conservative.
He makes up for his support of abortion by declaring he wants the legal limit lowered from 24 to 20 weeks. A real conservative would introduce a bill abolishing the practice all together.
In Australia, opposition leader Tony Abbott, a Catholic Conservative, wants to introduce a paid parental leave scheme if elected. Under a Coalition government, the parental leave payment would extend from 18 weeks (4 and a half months) to 6 months. It is akin to forced socialism, is anti business, and will encourage unprincipled types to have a baby so they can stay at home, while still getting full wages, for 6 months.
The same party, when in office, introduced the controversial Baby Bonus: an assistance payment to new parents. It has since gone from a lump sum payment to fortnightly instalments. However the damage was already done. People in low socio-economic regions suddenly turned into rabbits.
The $5000 (Australian money) payment went not on baby supplies, or towards medical bills, but on plasma TVs, drugs, cigarettes, alcohol.
In introducing this new welfare disease, the Coalition betrayed the people they were supposed to represent, and bowed to the demands of the welfare infected Left.
The Left want conservatives to meet them in the middle. But that "middle" keeps moving more and more to the Left each time.
Liberals cheer "moderate" conservatives, hoping that these "moderates" infect parties from the inside. There is evidence of this in the Australian Left's support for Malcolm Turnbull,
who advocates many Left leaning positions.
In America there are questions over Mitt Romney's sincerity as a conservative. Here is a man who was elected governor of the very liberal state of Massachusetts. A man who once publicly declared his support for Roe vs Wade. Showing he holds not only views unborn babies with contempt, but also the 10th Amendment.
The Left want THEIR Romney in the White House. It's a clever each way bet. If Obama is booted out, they can hope that THEIR Romney will take up residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Romney needs to show the Left that he's NOT their friend. He needs to show the Left that they already have their "Dear Leader." He needs to avoid bowing down to the principles, I
mean, lack of principles of the Left. Every politician wants to
appear trendy. Every politician wants to appeal to the 20-something vote, to the minority vote. Maybe it's time they started appealing to sense instead.
Keeping Them Honest
Phillip Adams in 2008. The disrespect towards the two women mentioned is shocking. Ignored by the Left at the time. Not surprising. At least the righteous Adams makes up for his demeaning remarks by refering to Melina Mercouri as a former actor, and not the politically incorrect title "actress."
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=aQet_rjCi3kC&pg=PA24&lpg=PP1&dq=The+best+Australian+humourous+writing&output=html_text
Tuesday, 2 October 2012
More From NYT
Unity, homogeneity, national and historical pride. The South has a culture that can never be eroded by government. These are the reasons that the South is now in a boom, while Northern cities like Detroit decay.
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/10/01/the-souths-enduring-conservativism/the-american-souths-inescapable-history
The South and Conservatism
NYTimes debate on conservatism in the Deep South.
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/10/01/the-souths-enduring-conservativism
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/10/01/the-souths-enduring-conservativism
The Sensitive and Educated Left
The Left is unleashing it's inner homophobe. But that's ok. Because the man they are bullying is a conservative. So he's fair game. Besides, conservatives gays aren't real gays. Just like conservative Blacks aren't real Blacks. They're Uncle Toms.
See, to be part of the liberal progressive machine (it IS a machine) you have to have certain credentials and merits.
I once had a dream that I thought perfectly illustrated the Leftist ladder of merit. Like most dreams, it made little sense. But, then again, it was about the Left.
In the dream I am in a room surrounded by liberals. We are all rating each other based on particular "progressive" things we have supported or achieved. For example: a woman in the dream says that she donated blankets to a Tibetan orphanage; another supported some splinter resistance group. Do-gooder causes like that.
As the dream went on the examples of do-gooder achievements went from ridiculous to "messed up in a way only drug legalizing, Marx loving liberals can be messed up."
One person dusted Bono's jacket.
"Up the ladder you go."
Another person smiled at an African child.
"Here are the keys to heaven, you Messiah, you."
Plant a tree in an orphanage garden while thanking Gaia and the whales.
In reality, it's not much different. The sanctimonious Left think their feel good activism permits them to be homophobic, vicious, and down right crude at certain times. They are just like pious priests who think their holy devotion licenses them to abuse young boys. Those who do good, or seem to, think that this gives them a surplus of holiness.
If you donate to African aid agencies you can make the occasional racist joke, or protest when African workers try to get jobs in Australian mines.
If you support gay marriage you can make sexual remarks about gays whose politics you don't agree with.
Liberals are always going on about how we big bad conservatives need sensitivity training. Yet all their "sensitivity" didn't prevent them from making comments about Sarah Palin's down syndrome child.
Liberals believe in women's rights and free will; yet they criticise Ann Romney for being a stay at home mum.
Their hypocrisy and double standards know no bounds. Sanctimony is an art to them; and the perform it very well.
In Australia, they are now using comments, made by radio host Alan Jones, as an excuse to fling homophobic slurs.
"Educated" liberals should know better than to use someone's sexuality against them. But that's exactly what they are doing with Alan Jones. It's disgraceful; but it shows them up for the hypocrites they are.
Sensitivity training anyone?
See, to be part of the liberal progressive machine (it IS a machine) you have to have certain credentials and merits.
I once had a dream that I thought perfectly illustrated the Leftist ladder of merit. Like most dreams, it made little sense. But, then again, it was about the Left.
In the dream I am in a room surrounded by liberals. We are all rating each other based on particular "progressive" things we have supported or achieved. For example: a woman in the dream says that she donated blankets to a Tibetan orphanage; another supported some splinter resistance group. Do-gooder causes like that.
As the dream went on the examples of do-gooder achievements went from ridiculous to "messed up in a way only drug legalizing, Marx loving liberals can be messed up."
One person dusted Bono's jacket.
"Up the ladder you go."
Another person smiled at an African child.
"Here are the keys to heaven, you Messiah, you."
Plant a tree in an orphanage garden while thanking Gaia and the whales.
In reality, it's not much different. The sanctimonious Left think their feel good activism permits them to be homophobic, vicious, and down right crude at certain times. They are just like pious priests who think their holy devotion licenses them to abuse young boys. Those who do good, or seem to, think that this gives them a surplus of holiness.
If you donate to African aid agencies you can make the occasional racist joke, or protest when African workers try to get jobs in Australian mines.
If you support gay marriage you can make sexual remarks about gays whose politics you don't agree with.
Liberals are always going on about how we big bad conservatives need sensitivity training. Yet all their "sensitivity" didn't prevent them from making comments about Sarah Palin's down syndrome child.
Liberals believe in women's rights and free will; yet they criticise Ann Romney for being a stay at home mum.
Their hypocrisy and double standards know no bounds. Sanctimony is an art to them; and the perform it very well.
In Australia, they are now using comments, made by radio host Alan Jones, as an excuse to fling homophobic slurs.
"Educated" liberals should know better than to use someone's sexuality against them. But that's exactly what they are doing with Alan Jones. It's disgraceful; but it shows them up for the hypocrites they are.
Sensitivity training anyone?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)